Report Contents

  1. Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative Research Study Report. This report includes all data included in the clinical report as well as supplemental drug specific interpretations and educational material.
  2. Clinical Report. This report was generated and approved by Coriell’s CLIA certified genotyping laboratory.
Coriell Institute for Medical Research
Coriell Genotyping and Microarray Center
403 Haddon Avenue Camden, NJ 08103
Phone: 856-966-7377 Fax: 856-964-0254  www.coriell.org
CYP2C19 GENE TEST FOR PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR RESPONSE
Name: STEVE CPMC
Date of Birth:
Coriell ID: DEMOSTEVE
Lab Accessioning Number: DEMOSTEVE
Ordering Physician:
Sample Type: Saliva
Gender: Male
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Date of Report: 07/05/2013
NAME OF GENE: CYP2C19 LOCATION OF GENE: 10q24
Variants tested RESULT Reference Genotype
rs4244285 (CYP2C19*2) GG G G
rs4986893 (CYP2C19*3) GG G G
rs28399504 (CYP2C19*4) AA A A
rs56337013 (CYP2C19*5) CC C C
rs72558184 (CYP2C19*6) GG G G
rs72558186 (CYP2C19*7) TT T T
rs41291556 (CYP2C19*8) TT T T
rs17884712 (CYP2C19*9) GG G G
rs6413438 (CYP2C19*10) CC C C
rs12248560 (CYP2C19*17) CT C C
^ When the Result for all CYP2C19 variants tested are the same as the reference, the Combined Result is called CYP2C19 *1/*1. In some cases, due to technical limitations, your Combined Result may not be able to be determined. It may still be possible to provide an interpretation for such a result based on possible genetic outcomes (for example in rare combinations of non-reference results at more than one variant, or the presence of a “result not available” at one or more variants).
Risk interpretation based on Coriell’s CYP2C19/PPI Response Genotype Translation Version 1 (June 2013).

Interpretation

There is insufficient published clinical data to interpret the impact of this individual’s genetic combination on response to PPIs.

Test Limitations

DNA-based testing is highly accurate, however there are many sources of potential error including: mis-identification of samples, rare technical errors, trace contamination of PCR reactions, and rare genetic variants that interfere with analysis. There may be other variants in the CYP2C19 gene that are not included in this test, that influence the response to PPIs. This test or one or more of its components was developed and its performance characteristics determined by the Coriell Institute for Medical Research. It has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA has determined that such approval is not necessary. The Coriell Institute is regulated under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988 as qualified to perform high-complexity testing.

Test Methodology

Saliva samples were collected using Oragene DNA Collection Kits (DNA Genotek) and DNA was extracted manually according to the manufacturer’s instructions or automatically using a DNAdvance Kit (Agencourt). Purified DNA was quantified using UV absorbance at 260 nm. One microgram of the resulting DNA from each sample was used as template in the Affymetrix DMET Plus GeneChip assay. Data analysis was performed using Affymetrix DMET Console software.

electronically signed by
Marie Hoover, PhD, Laboratory Director


References

  1. Baldwin R M, et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008;65(5):767-774.
  2. Furuta T, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999;65(5):552-561.
  3. Furuta T, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002;72(4):453-460.
  4. Gawronska-Szklarz B, et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2010;66(7):681-687.
  5. Horai Y, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15(6):793-803.
  6. Hu YM, et al. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12(29):4750-4753.
  7. Hunfeld NG, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31(1):150-159.
  8. Kawamura M, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17(7):965-973.
  9. Kurzawski M, et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62(10):877-880.
  10. Rocha A, et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008;64(9):901-906.
  11. Roh HK, et al. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2004;95(3):112-119.
  12. Sagar M, et al. Gastroenterology 2000;119(3):670-676.
  13. Shirai N, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15(12):1929-1937.
  14. Sim SC, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006;79(1):103-113.
  15. Sugimoto M, et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;24(11):1725-1732.
  16. Take S, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98(11):2403-2408.
  17. Wang H, et al. Drug Metab Dispos 2011;39(5):830-837.
  18. Zendehdel N, et al. Arch Iran Med 2010;13(5):406-412.